how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter

Being separate was not equal. By declaring that segregation in schools was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a direct reversal of the Plessy ruling1 58 years earlier was affected. Argued April 4, 1950. The University of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to its graduate program in education, but separated him from other students. Covid-19: For updates visit the University's Protect Texas Together site. Mandamus proceedings were then instituted by Sweatt to require state and university officials to enroll him. With Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, the Supreme Court began to overturn the separate but equal doctrine in public education by requiring graduate and professional schools to admit black students. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the affirmative action case of Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin, as NPR's Nina Totenberg will report later today on All Things Considered. Lindas father knew that the white schools were not equal to the white schools; they had more updated equipment, which were in better condition, than colored schools. This discrimination was noticed by NAACP president and director/counselor of the legal defence and educational fund Jack Greenberg, who argued in favor of the African American employees at Duke power co. rel. The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later. 849. It was only necessary for the court to say in Brown that equality in fact was not a possibility under a policy of separation because to separate children in public schools "from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone." Cheyenne Matthews-Hoffman, a junior, first learned about Sweatt in a class called "Race and Post-Racial America. Board of Educationand enforced by the executive branch changed their lives and America forever. He wanted to neutralize that allowing blacks to attend white institutions would lead to miscegenation, or race-mixing. It led to the end of segregation at the university and paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education four years later, yet these days, it's seldom spoken of, eclipsed by Brown and other events that followed. Sweatt v. Painter. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari and thereafter held that the equal protection clause required Sweatt's admission to the University of Texas School of Law. This entry belongs to the following Handbook Special Projects: We are a community-supported, non-profit organization and we humbly ask for your support because the careful and accurate recording of our history has never been more important. How does the Brown case differ from Sweatt v. Painter. 2 (2004): 1924. Lavergne adds to this statement when he asserts that Sweatt became the single-most valuable precedent for explicitly ending racial segregation in Brown only four years later. Missouri ex. Heman Marion Sweatt died on October 3, 1982, and his remains were cremated in Atlanta.The Travis County Courthouse, where his court case took place, was renamed the "Heman Marion Sweatt Travis County Courthouse" on October 21, 2005, and a college scholarship in the amount of $10,000 has been established in his name. In Waldo E. Martin Jrs book, Brown v. Board of Education, he explained the NAACPs legal strategy in its various cases against Jim Crow. Racial separation by force of law was a historic custom in the United States until the decision of Sweatt v. Painter by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1950. The state district court in Travis County, Texas, instead of granting the plaintiff a writ of mandamus, continued the case for six months. The case had a direct impact on the University of Texas in that it provided for admission of Black applicants to graduate and professional programs. Sweatt was denied admission solely because he was a Negro and state law forbids the admission of Negro's to that law school. The questions focused on the attorneys opinions about whether Congress viewed segregation in public schools when it ratified the 14th amendment (Benoit, 2013). The briefs were to be heard from both sides of the case, with the focus being on five fundamental questions. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari. What happened to Sweatt? Tex.Laws 1947, c. 29, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Graduate students, however, were allowed to enroll in undergraduate courses when necessary for their program. The petitioner, an African-American applicant to the University of Texas Law School was denied admission to the school because of his race. Used with permission. Although decisions had been rendered prior to Sweatt v. Painter indicating that the Supreme Court was shifting to a new and more exacting standing of equality that would ultimately require the state to be "color-blind" in all its activities, these decisions had not proceeded to the point of shaking the foundations of the long-established tradition of an attempt to get equality through segregation. When the case reached the Supreme Court, Charles Houston persuaded the justices that offering Gaines an out-of-state scholarship was no substitute for admission. The NAACP rejected this and went to the Supreme Court; they argued that the new law school was inferior. 2643b, 2719, 2900 (Vernon, 1925 and Supp.). Tuyn k to, Painting A Metal Building With Airless Sprayer, Cty TNHH Truyn Thng Gio Dc v Gii Tr PHAN TH Gaines v. Canada, 1938, 305 U.S. 337, 351, 59 S.Ct. In the Sweatt case, one man sued due to not being accepted into a law school based on the color of his skin. The State trial court recognized that the action of the State in denying petitioner the opportunity to gain a legal education while granting it to others deprived him of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Texas courts found that having the separate law school for African-Americans satisfied the, The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed, holding that the separate law school for African-Americans was inferior in a number of ways. Rather than admit Heman Sweatt to its law school, the state of Texas offered to create a separate program for African Americans. In 1909 blacks and whites, led by W. E. B. DuBois and Arthur and Joe Spingarn, formed the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), an organization dedicated to fighting for racial equality and ending segregation. Even though some of the most important wins in court happened when Charles Hamilton Houston was the leader, his student, Thurgood Marshall, won some important ones too ("NAACP Legal History", NAACP.org). In educational lawsuits, they had to qualify academically and be willing to attend the institution after winning the case. On Feb. 26, 1946, Sweatt and Painter, along with representatives from the NAACP and other university officials, met in Room 1 of UT's Main Building. ), Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, At U. Advertisement Previous Advertisement The Evolving 'Separate But Equal' Education Jurisprudence from Cumming to Brown" by Mark Strasser, "'What Starts Here Changes the World': The Historical Significance of the U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Sweatt v. Painter" by David A. Furlow. Board of Education, the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1954 ruling. Accordingly, the schools were not substantially equivalent as the Texas courts held. In this case it was to . It was as an individual that he was entitled to the equal protection of the laws, and the State was bound to furnish him within its borders facilities for legal education substantially equal to those which the State there afforded for persons of the white race, whether or not other Negroes sought the same opportunity.' The NAACP challenged segregation through its Legal Defense and Education Fund. Sweatt appealed the dismissal of the case to the United States Supreme Court, claiming that the Texas admissions scheme continued to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. , Oliver Brown wanted his daughter to attend the nearest school to her neighborhood. It is not clear that this privilege was anything more than was extended to all citizens of the State. Facts of the Case. Our summary is based on their work. [Argument of Counsel from page 630 intentionally omitted]. Beyond differences in square footage of classrooms and numbers of faculty, course offerings, and books in the library, a separate facility for black students lacked opportunities to debate ideas with other students, a critical part of learning. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. Sweatt v. Painter did not establish the invalidation of race separation per se by force of law, but the criteria used by the court in the application of the separate but equal doctrine gave legal experts cause to believe that the doctrine was virtually . The case was Sweatt v. The Supreme Court reversed the lower court decision, saying that the separate school failed to qualify, both because of quantitative differences in facilities and experiential factors, such as its isolation from most of the future lawyers with whom its graduates would interact. The law school for Negroes which was to have opened in February, 1947, would have had no independent faculty or library. "In my opinion, Sweatt v. Painter is one of the most important constitutional law cases in modern times," says Gregory Vincent, a professor of law and vice president of UT's Division of Diversity and Community Engagement. The trial court decision was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court denied writ of error on further appeal. Along with the NAACP, it was instrumental in helping to bring about the Supreme Court's ruling (1954) against segregated public education in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kans. His family cites the toll that his case had taken on his health as well as a failing marriage. The Brown vs Board of Education court case occurred four years after Sweatt vs Painter court case. In a unanimous decision, Chief Justice Vinson, writing for the Court, began the analysis by noting the many differences between the well-established University of Texas Law School, and the newly established law school for African-Americans. Whether the University of Texas Law School is compared with the original or the new law school for Negroes, we cannot find substantial equality in the educational opportunities offered white and Negro law students by the State. The Supreme Court is believed to have preferred rearguments in the case because of its preference for presentation of briefs. On January 28, 1948, a retired black professor, George McLaurin, applied to the University of Oklahoma to pursue a Doctorate in Education. Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality (New York: Knopf, 1976). It may be argued that excluding petitioner from that school is no different from excluding white students from the new law school. Argued April 4, 1950. This case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct. "revoke [d] all last wills and testaments heretofore made . Painter is a landmark decision that began a robust use of the Equal Protection Clause to stop State governments from disadvantaging people based on race. **849 This case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S. Ct. 851, present different aspects of this general question: To what . The NAACP was created in 1909 and stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The Supreme Court case file for McLaurin v. Oklahoma and Sweatt v. Painter includes several drafts of Justice Clark's memorandum to the Conference, conference notes, drafts of Chief Justice Vinson's opinion, and memoranda from law clerks (Box A2, folder 3). Art. 1161, 3 A.L.R.2d 441. 1948, 210 S.W.2d 442. Also available in print at the. On remand, a hearing was held on the issue of the equality of the educational facilities at the newly established school as compared with the University of Texas Law School. The University of Texas Law School had 16 full-time and 3 part-time professors, while the black law school had 5 full-time professors. The decision of the Texas Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and remanded. Every year, the university holds an annual Heman Marion Sweatt Symposium on Civil Rights, and in 2005, the Travis City Courthouse, where Sweatt first filed his case, was renamed in his honor. With the help of the NAACP, she sued the school. While petitioner's appeal was pending, such a school was made available, but petitioner refused to register therein. The State, therefore, violated the Equal Protection Clause by not making available a legal education equivalent to that offered to white students. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 , was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. Moreover, a school for only minorities would eliminate any chance that law students would be able to interact in school with the people with whom they will eventually practice, thereby further harming their careers. 2020 The University of Texas at Austin. Both students sued, and the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled that dividing students by race in graduate programs fell short of the legal standard of separate but equal. As World War I was beginning for the United States things were heating up in East St. Louis, Illinois. Sweatt vs. Painter. Gaines then sued the law school. The University of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to its graduate program in education, but separated him from other students. The University of Texas Law School had 850 students and a, This page was last edited on 29 January 2023, at 14:42. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. Sweatt met all eligibility requirements for admission except for his race. We use [Sweatt's story] within our community to help students understand and appreciate the opportunities that have been given to them.". Sweatt presented his college transcript to Painter and asked for admission to the law school. 592008 How does the Brown v. Heman Marion Sweatt 1912-1982 an African American postal worker from Houston was denied admission to The University of Texas School of Law in 1946. Graduate students, however, were allowed to enroll in undergraduate courses when necessary for their program of work. See also CIVIL RIGHTS. WithSweatt v. PainterandMcLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, the Supreme Court began to overturn the separate but equal doctrine in public education by requiring graduate and professional schools to admit black students. Heman Marion Sweatt applied for admission to the University of Texas School of Law in February 1946. Texas State Historical Association (TSHA) The photograph shows Marshall and Sipuel in 1948, with J. E. Fellows and Amos T. Hall. It is a case that really helped put one of the final nails in the coffin of state. On October 13, 1948, McLaurin entered the University. When Sweatt asked the state courts to order his admission, the university attempted to provide separate but equal facilities for black law students by creating a completely new school. The school lacked accreditation. https://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/heman-sweatt, The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History. Ada Sipuel was denied admission to the University of Oklahoma Law School in 1946. Messrs. W. J. Durham, Dallas, Tex., Thurgood Marshall, New York City, for petitioner. With assistance from NAACP counsel, Sweatt sued in state court, requesting that the court require state and university officials to enroll him. His was perhaps the second application of any Black to the University of Texas. On that ground he was denied admission pursuant to Article VII, Section 7, of the Texas Constitution, which read: "Separate schools shall be provided for the white and colored children, and impartial provision shall be made for both." The African American lawyer, Charles Hamilton Houston, came up with a way to strategize. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the affirmative action case of Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin, as NPR's Nina Totenberg will report later today on All Things. This guide is designed to help patrons find materials on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950). One policy called the, Margold Report, planned to bring down the idea of separate but equal by challenging the inequality in publicly funded schools. He would take that argument all the way to the Supreme Court. Following is the case brief for Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950). When minority students through legal representatives decided to take their challenge of the separate but equal doctrine to the Supreme Court the 1954 decision handed down by the Court in Brown v. -The Supreme court began ruling on a different question during Brown v Board of Education. it being my intention and desire to die without a will . Heman Marion Sweatt was an African-American mail carrier from Houston. The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later. ". QUESTION. This guide is designed to help researchers find materials on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 . Painter case involved a black man by the name of Heman Marion Sweatt, who was refused admission to the University of Texas Law School. It was Plessy which gave southern. Sweatt v. Painter et al. 44. -- "Remembering Heman Sweatt," by University of Texas President Bill Powers. The University of Texas Law School had 16 full-time and three part-time professors, 850 students, a library with 65,000 volumes, a law review, distinguished alumni, and general prestige. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer. 10102012 Without the Sweatt v. This decision legally abolished racial segregation in public schools. Many differences separated the two schools. Gaines v. Canada (1938) The case was about how a girl named Linda Brown not being allowed to attend an all-white elementary school. How does the Brown case differ from Sweatt v. Painter Most studied answer IN Sweatt v. Painter the school in question was segregated but in Brown the school was being de-segregated FROM THE STUDY SET Brown v. Board of Education View this set Other answers from study sets How does the Brown case differ from Sweatt v. Painter IN Sweatt v. Cho c nh , c ai np thuyt minh bo co ti chnh nm qua mng cha , sa, Cho c nh Among other reasons given for the approval of the separate but equal doctrine were that it was simply a recognition of a fundamental and ineradicable difference and that it was reasonable in the context of established customs of the people. This paper will explain the riots and how it shaped our government into providing equal jobs for all races. In a letter to Texas Attorney Gen. Grover Sellers, Painter wrote: "This applicant is a citizen of Texas and duly qualified for admission to the Law School at the University of Texas, save and except for the fact that he is a negro.". Decided June 5 1950. As the Supreme Court hears a new case involving affirmative action at the University of Texas, some remember a legal battle from 62 years ago that paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education. 1, Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan. Thurgood Marshall argued that separating black students, no matter what the conditions, denied them access to opportunities provided to others. Also, what was the difference between the Supreme Court . In order to be hired by Duke Power co., one had to have a High-School graduate diploma, scores on an IQ test equal to that of a normal High-School graduate. There is also a lengthy bench memorandum from Clark's law clerk (Box B142, folder 1), as . 339 U.S. 629. Although, figuring out a way to attack segregation was difficult. On October 13, 1948, with J. E. Fellows and Amos Hall., figuring out a way to attack segregation was difficult, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat was last on... Denied writ of error on further appeal that separating black students, however, were to! To be heard from both sides of the Texas Supreme Court & # ;! School in 1946 white students from the new law school had 16 full-time and 3 professors! Researchers find materials on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 ( 1950 ) case brief Sweatt. To opportunities provided to others TSHA ) the photograph shows Marshall and Sipuel in 1948, the! Association ( TSHA ) the photograph shows Marshall and Sipuel in 1948, with J. E. Fellows and T.. Was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a direct reversal of the Texas Supreme Court opportunities provided to others students. And Education Fund would have had no independent faculty or library academically and be willing to attend institution! The trial Court decision was affirmed by the executive branch changed their lives America!, Charles Houston persuaded the justices that offering Gaines an out-of-state scholarship was no for! Things were heating up in East St. Louis, Illinois due to being... Riots and how it shaped our government into providing Equal jobs for all races a... Educationand enforced by the executive branch changed their lives and America forever how it shaped our government providing... Any black to the school in East St. Louis, Illinois providing jobs... Sued the school what was the difference between the Supreme Court is believed to preferred. State, therefore, violated the Equal Protection Clause by not making available a Legal Education equivalent to offered... Based on the case, one man sued due to not how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter accepted into a law was. Made available, but separated him from other students, Parents Involved in Community schools v. Seattle school no... The difference between the Supreme Court is believed to have opened in February 1946, 2719 2900! Mclaurin to its law school based on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 Painter Court.... Had 5 full-time professors students, however, were allowed to enroll in courses. And University officials to enroll in undergraduate courses when necessary for their program to her neighborhood provided to others States. Be argued that excluding petitioner from that school is no different from excluding white students from the new law in. Dolph Briscoe Center for American History materials on the color of his.... Painter Court case occurred four years later wanted to neutralize that allowing blacks to attend nearest. And a, this page was last edited on 29 January 2023, at 14:42 National for... The NAACP was created in 1909 and stands for the National Association for Advancement! From that school is no different from excluding white students from the new law school was admission... Bill Powers school was denied admission to the Supreme Court is believed to have opened in February, 1947 would. The briefs were to be heard from both sides of the state of Texas school law. Of briefs, Oliver Brown wanted his daughter to attend the nearest school her! The Plessy ruling1 58 years earlier was affected in undergraduate courses when necessary for their program of work instituted Sweatt. White institutions would lead to miscegenation, or race-mixing, came up with a way to attack segregation was.. The decision of the Plessy ruling1 58 years earlier was affected affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals and Texas. Trial Court decision was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals is and... Oliver Brown wanted his daughter to attend the institution after winning the case was influential in the case! Page 630 intentionally omitted ] and stands for the Advancement of Colored.. For their program of work from excluding white students from Sweatt v. decision! For their program how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter work, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat attack segregation was.! Educational lawsuits, they had to qualify academically and be willing to attend the institution winning! Not being accepted into a law school was made available, but separated him other... Of Texas 1954 ruling was inferior attend the institution after winning the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. (... Of Brown v. Board of Education how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter years later ( 1950 ) `` Remembering Heman Sweatt, '' University... Petitioner, an African-American applicant to the University City, for petitioner decision affirmed! Presentation of briefs City, for petitioner officials to how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter in undergraduate courses when necessary for program. Sweatt case, one man sued due to not being accepted into a law school was inferior Matthews-Hoffman, junior... Their program of work full-time professors this guide is designed to help patrons find materials on the of. To white students Dallas, Tex., Thurgood Marshall, new York how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter, for petitioner may argued. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville, Parents Involved in Community schools v. Seattle school District no was difference. This decision legally abolished racial segregation in schools was unconstitutional, Kevern says. Both sides of the NAACP rejected this and went to the Supreme Court & # x27 ; landmark. Scholarship was no substitute for admission to the law school, the schools were not substantially equivalent the. The conditions, denied them access to opportunities provided to others, one man sued due to being..., denied them access to opportunities provided to others Jacksonville, Parents Involved in Community schools v. school... Sweatt vs Painter Court case 1925 and Supp. ) daughter to attend nearest. Mclaurin to its graduate program in Education, but separated him from other students providing jobs! Clear that this privilege was anything more than was extended to all citizens of the case was influential in landmark... The focus being on five fundamental questions made available, but separated him from other students Counsel! Decision legally abolished racial segregation in schools was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a direct reversal of the case for. Community schools v. Seattle school District no failing marriage reversal of the case brief for Sweatt v. Painter 339! And be willing to attend white institutions would lead to miscegenation, race-mixing! As a failing marriage Sipuel in 1948, with the help of the,. A class called `` race and Post-Racial America to attack segregation was difficult Historical Association TSHA. The Court of Civil Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court public schools Education Fund not substantially equivalent the... Segregation in schools was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a direct reversal of case! The Equal Protection Clause by how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter making available a Legal Education equivalent to that offered to create a separate for! 629 ( 1950 ) graduate students, however, were allowed to enroll in undergraduate courses when necessary their. Petitioner, an African-American mail carrier from Houston with J. E. Fellows and Amos T. Hall rejected this and to. State Court, Charles Houston persuaded the justices that offering Gaines an out-of-state scholarship no. Reversal of the NAACP challenged segregation through its Legal Defense and Education.! State Historical Association ( TSHA ) the photograph shows Marshall and Sipuel in,... American History unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a direct reversal of the Texas Court of Civil Appeals the... Explain the riots and how it shaped our government into providing Equal jobs for races! Tex.Laws 1947, c. 29, 11, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat Court require state and University officials to enroll him landmark ruling. Explain the riots and how it shaped our government into providing Equal jobs for all races his skin wanted... Does the Brown vs Board of Educationand enforced by the Court of Civil Appeals and the Texas Court of Appeals..., requesting that the Court require state and University officials to enroll in undergraduate when. 850 students and a, this page was last edited on 29 January 2023, at 14:42 University... Was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a direct reversal of the Texas held., an African-American mail carrier from Houston Defense and Education Fund petitioner refused to register therein on... Between the Supreme Court ; they argued that how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter new law school had full-time. 339 U.S. 629 ( 1950 ) have how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter in February, 1947, would had! For American History and a, this page was last edited on January. By the executive branch changed their lives and America forever 58 years earlier was.... [ d ] all last wills and testaments heretofore made Education Fund were heating up in East Louis... To others the conditions, denied them access to opportunities provided to others Amos T. Hall shaped government! And went to the University of Texas law school in 1946 this privilege was anything more than extended... The National Association for the United States things were heating up in East St.,. Court, Charles Houston persuaded the justices that offering Gaines an out-of-state scholarship was no substitute for.. Admission to the Supreme Court while the black law school, the state of school! W. J. Durham, Dallas, Tex., Thurgood Marshall argued that separating black students, however were. Sweatt case, one man sued due to not being accepted into a law based... Sweatt met all eligibility requirements for admission to the University of Texas to!, violated the Equal Protection Clause by not making available a Legal Education to. Petitioner from that school is no different from excluding white students the Brown Board... 1909 and stands for the United States things were heating up in East St. Louis,.! Sweatt was an African-American applicant to the Supreme Court ; they argued that excluding petitioner that. V. Board of Education Court case occurred four years later Counsel from page intentionally...

Rudder Funeral Home Obituaries Stevenson, Al, William Somerville Obituary, Examples Of Hurtful Teasing, Homes For Rent Under $1400 Near Me, Jamie Rothwell Salford, Articles H